Commenter "Bubba" posted an interesting link on the risks of Guardasil relative to other rare occurances, like getting hit by lightning:
Regarding Garadsil:
http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2009/how-safe-is-the-hpv-vaccine/
So... yeah...
Commenter Federalist still argues that the risk of actually getting cancer from HPV is small, not making even that small risk that Guardasil causes worth it.
Part of what is going on here, I think, is what I call "The Illusion of Control". Educated parents feel that if they go out and research everything, they can control what risks their kids are exposed to.
Perhaps in the past, certain risks were just accepted as a normal part of life, sort of like how Muslims today accept death stoicly as "Allah's Will".
I'm more of the opinion that "shit happens". ;)
The problem with these educated parents is multifold:
1) the risks that they're trying to manage are miniscule. For example, my pet peeve, stranger danger. Children being abducted by strangers is a very, very rare occurance. Maybe Bubba can find a link that ranks that risk relative to others, but it's less likely than getting hit by lightning.
2) By trying to manage these miniscule risks, there are horrendous unintended consequences. For example, becuase of fear of stranger danger, kids are now not allowed to roam freely in their own neighborhoods. Could it be that part of the childhood obesity epidemic is a result of this?
3) What about the stress on parents and kids? Obsession with stranger danger is causing undue stress on parents, and makes those who AREN'T obsessed with it feel guilty. What is this stress and guilt doing to the health of these parents and kids?
We're in a strange place as a society. Public health has been so successful that the risks that we do face are largely of our own making. For example, instead of pathogens in the drinking water killing us, obesity is. Or not wearing your seat belt.
As a result, there is a lot of focus on getting people to manage their own risks. The problem is that people are not good at weighing risk, and can suffer from availability and other biases that make them focus on the wrong risks.
Or maybe we should all just RELAX and enjoy ourselves. Obesity is never going to kill as many people as Cholera did. Letting your kid sit in the front seat of the car (which I do) exposes him to more risk than sitting in the middle position of the back seat, but so what? The increase in risk is miniscule. And the pleasure of having your kid next to you, talking and enjoying the heated seats and controling the radio and having a better view of what's passing by as you drive, is worth a little extra risk.
Federalist will say that this contradicts my position on the H1N1 vaccine. It doesn't. In that case, the public health establishment has determined that, based on what happened in Mexico, H1N1 is a pandemic. As a result they fast tracked the vaccine and implemented a program to get it out to those most at risk: children and young people. I do think that, in this case, they're the experts, they have information and expertise that we don't. We should do what they say.